Criminal Court Visit Essay Essay

AbstractThe object of this paper is to set off the different aspect of the Criminal arbiter after tour the flagitious jurist office(s). The sojourn is done during the last week of September 2010 and the visiting point was the United States District First Court of Appeal, the administration turn up at 301 S. ML King Blvd. Tallahassee, Florida. In this paper the findings will be discussed that what factors (selected) ar involved that guess the process of administration of justice. It will be tried the best to explain the observations and views with comparison and contrast. However, the points will be discussed in narrative format to grab the information precisely.The Criminal Court call up and the Observations First, have some information about the Criminal Justice. The Criminal Justice is the system or group of system and institutions that have the prime state to mitigate the crime or crime rate and to take incumbent actions to cope with the situations that is critical and sensitive in nature to follow the nonaggressive environment of the association. It is ideal profession for those who has investigative mind. The Presidents accusation defined the nefarious justice system as the means for guild to enforce the standards of conduct necessary to protect individuals and the community. (The Challenge of wickedness in a Free Society, 1967) The Criminal Justice system has trinity main parts Police, Courts and Jails likewise known as Corrections simply all these parts have one main goal that is to maintain the rule of faithfulness within the society by operating with coordination nether one umbrella that is Law.PolicePolice is the front face of the guilty justice system that has the prime responsibility to maintain the peace and simplicity the law and order situation as per their jurisdictions according to the predefined law. Police are also responsible to decrease the Crime rate in the society. In USA the police department was founded in 1908. Police itself has multidimensional activities to warrant the peace, calm and trust throughout the society.CourtsCourts are the place where disputes are colonised down and finalized after thorough debates and analyses according to the law. There are subprogram of professionals in whatsoever court who perform their responsibilities as per their role comparable pass judgment, prosecutor and attorney usually belong to defense. The one most serious personality in that court sitting is the judge that has a exceptional authority to settle the dispute.Corrections or penalizationCorrections or punishment is the outcome for the final decision of the court against the crime. The main purpose to keep the person in jail or prison is dismantle him from the society to prevent any barely sensitive or law and order situation. There are also other different forms of punishment and corrections like to impose financial penalties, probation and house hang-up. The house arrest sanction is th e type of punishment that limits the persons mobility to prevent others and society from his or her negative activities.Reflections with compare and contrast after seeVisiting the Criminal court, enable us to enhance our knowledge about the operation that is the part and parcel of administration of the justice. In that connection, the book criminal justice today by Frank Schmallegar provided the necessary information. The observation was based on the ongoing court trial on the violent attacks on both blameless citizens. (The identities will not be shown, because of personal reason/request). concord to the case the victims Mr. A and Mr. O were driving on the way, during the driving in that location Car rammed from the back. When they got out checking that issue and cause of rammed, suddenly they were harmed by the face pack that comprises with four people who had iron rods in their hands. The accused person got into his gondola car and dragged the Mr. A along the road for a di stance of 40 to 50 yards. However, the victim rushed to the near hospital still he died because of numerous rib fractures, the livers trauma and haemorrhaging, followed by a repress of heart attacks. After and during the hearing of this tragic and inhuman story on that point was a pin-drop silence inside the court. The lawyer of the accused tried to arrest by saying that the above mentioned story about crime diorama was far from reality but the judge refused it when the criminal history is cited by the victims lawyer thatthe accused criminal already has the constitution of murder trial that was started in six month before, he also referred the criminals girlfriend who declared herself as a uncongenial witness. The victims lawyer also presented the Toxicological reports that have the name evidences of identical sweat, fiber and finger prints matches. When these evidences presented, the criminals lawyer had no way but to accept and keep silence, after examining the report and e vidences the test started to express his remarks by saying that Quite Shocking. He further said that Mr. A and Mr. O was the respective and law-abiding citizens and has no any criminal records, who were rammed and assaulted by the accused person and his gang in a highly violent and inhuman manner. Judge further said that the criminal also has a record of previous hearing but he didnt learn any lesson from them. Judge further added that this action is barbarous morally and this crime is very high in the ranking of manslaughter. Finally, the judge sentenced the 10 years among the final year suspended for the manslaughter.This court visit and the continue of above mentioned case opened many dimension in front of me. This visit enriched my experience about the criminal court and its transaction about the particular case, the way that both parties argued and raised the concerns and the deep persuasion ability of the judge who gave final judgment. Furthermore, there are plenty of issu es that command to be addressed but another important point that is discover generally about the Proceeding, is the media reporting. The main concern that is raised by the court prescribeds is about the live camera coverage, according to them the camera coverage manufacture a tension to make a reasonable judgment because during the solely process the officials feel confused to express their views thoroughly because of the mass reactions. The official concerned that the mass reaction is not the main issue but to satisfy them on each and every legal issues because of the ignorance of law and legal proceeding of the justice. They claimed that this camera coverage and its related issue converted the courtroom and its proceeding into media circus. But the counter argument that is in favor of camera coverage is that, these camera coverage is the catalyst to make the whole proceeding crystallization clear as per law and the assurance that the all proceeding that affect the administ ration of justice is bias less. This live camera coverage is the antidote for those elements who affect directly or in directly to the whole affect and are the main cause(s) of dissatisfaction about any particular aspect or whole of the proceedings However, the positive point is that some professionals are in favor to do these activities during the proceeding, as per their viewpoint the live coverage via electronic media and devices make the proceeding of the administration of justice more trustable, accessible and diaphanous among the masses.