Identify Two Reports on Serious Failures to Protect Individuals from Abuse Essay

Abuse can happen anywhere anytime, tho especi bothy to vulnerable people, ie Children, elderly people, people with disabilities, people with information difficulties. It can even happen in places people should be safe, ie hospitals, residential/ nursing homes, schools, dayc atomic number 18/ nurseries, centres etc. I researched two racing shells account for abuse. The Winterbourne case which was nation in ally describe, and a local abuse case of Orme fellowship in Lowestoft. The Winterbourne case was more physical and wound up abuse and the Orme fellowship case was more neglect and poor living conditions.The Winterbourne case was reported nationally because it was much(prenominal) a disgusting mistreatment of vulnerable people, 11 members of round were caught on cctv after visitors and patients complained about mistreatments. The evidence that was captured showed physical abuse such as, slapping, poking eyes, pulling hair, even as unbelievable as caparison them under chair s, and soaking residents in freezing cold water. It also showed emotional and verbal abuse in the form of name calling.This was an inhumane and rascally mistreatment of vulnerable individuals unable to defend themselves. Winterbourne appears to discombobulate made dicisions based on profits and returns, over and above dicisions about the effective and humane lurch of assessments and treatments. Where were the staff who should have been reporting these crimes to management , if management was not perceive then they should have been reported to the authorities and organisations, such as hearty services and cqc that is what they be there for.The staff who didnt abuse patients tho didnt report the incidents are just as abusive and amenable , as they were employed to help with patients welf safeguard, in turning a art eye they fai take to put the best interest of the patient first. The Orme ingleside case was locally reported due to neglect, residents were sleeping on dirty, in fested mattresses and eating determine aways provided due to lack of food on the premises. Poor wellness and safety, and health and hygiene conditions were due to untrained/poorly trained staff and reverseing(a) under staffed. Residents were taken to other residential homes in the area and Orme house was closed down.In both(prenominal) cases there does not appear to have been a governing staff body taking a pay and putting a stop to these behaviours, and no-one reported anything to the governing body CQC (care pure tone commision) or social services until sygnificant harm had already come to the residents of both these care homes. If these homes had a governing member of staff to ensure all care standards are met, where was their accountability. CQC are the governing body for all health and social care settings, they set out care standards and legislations and requirements that are to be met in each setting.These requirements and standards are normally brought into place by exploitation company policies and procedures, to protect all parties they may vary slightly, but all have to comply with the standards set out in legislations. There are a number of agencies that work together to ensure staff are vetted. The government commisioned the bichard inquiry (2002) and it looked at the way recruitment was carried out, the inquiry led to the safegaurding vulnerable groups act 2006 and the vetting and barring schemes.Which are run by the independant safegaurding delegacy (ISA) they work with the criminal records bureau(CRB) and protection of vulnerable adults/children (POVA/POCA) lists 99 to access anyone who wants to work with vulnerable groups. There is also the health and safety act 1974 and a number of health and environmental laws that should of been adhered to under the health and social care act 2008, every employer and employee has a duty of care to ensure a safe working and living environment for all staff and residents to which in these cases staff at both care homes failed.